{"id":"W2950945849","doi":"10.21511/ee.10(1).2019.03","title":"Green behavioral (in)consistencies: are pro-environmental behaviors in different domains substitutes or complements?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Economics","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ordered probit; Consumption (sociology); Environmental quality; Public good; Multivariate probit model; Environmental economics; Willingness to pay; Probit model; Public economics; Set (abstract data type); Quality (philosophy); Economics; Natural resource; Business; Marketing; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Ecology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003464093,0.0005179017,0.00109051,0.001780083,0.0006133485,0.00188314,0.0008054298,0.0007174289,0.00572198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009890683,0.0005016116,0.001085054,0.001636623,0.002027794,0.001609667,0.002071899,0.0009535782,0.0003092516],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007265104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006412731,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004001496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004732949,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978065,0.000945388,0.0001858466,0.0004135867,0.0003759614,0.00027271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812712,0.009181169,0.005395172,0.002251613,0.001167757,0.0007330197],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004722089,0.0004173175,0.9671933,0.0001358989,0.001003955,0.0002934812,0.001024051,0.003273826,0.001784387,0.0082014,0.0002156516,0.0159845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000187544,0.0003986276,0.9778943,0.00007592322,0.0004199299,0.0002481985,0.002424391,0.007235261,0.00100308,0.008704927,0.001538135,0.00003846439],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931486,0.0001277472,0.001676215,0.0001396219,0.00000724875,0.00002082852,0.0002643805,0.000008541987,0.004606898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986498,0.00005437134,0.0004658664,0.0000342714,0.000006758905,0.00001879319,0.0002886612,0.000003796352,0.0004777021],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00572198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01914197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01707731205151048,"score_gpt":0.2432317599349992,"score_spread":0.2261544478834887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}