{"id":"W2950990081","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1312.1831","title":"Welfare Maximization and Truthfulness in Mechanism Design with Ordinal Preferences","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Impossibility; Mechanism design; Outcome (game theory); Social choice theory; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Matching (statistics); Mathematical economics; Maximization; Computer science; Mechanism (biology); Rank (graph theory); Metric (unit); Voting; Matroid; Social Welfare; Pairwise comparison; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Discrete mathematics; Epistemology; Combinatorics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":{"n_in":0,"stratum":"aff_core","weight":5595.2375,"opus":{"tier":"OUT","genre":"empirical","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"Theoretical paper on welfare maximization and truthfulness in ordinal mechanism design."},"gpt":{"tier":"OUT","genre":"conceptual","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"It develops mathematical mechanisms for voting and matching markets, not methods of research."},"grok":{"tier":"OUT","genre":"conceptual","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"Theoretical mechanism design and voting/matching markets; computational social choice, not research practice."}},"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02638409,0.001729505,0.00177317,0.002411607,0.001216254,0.00520447,0.003370604,0.00330707,0.00426017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07650445,0.0009980268,0.002459793,0.00251055,0.008558881,0.01108117,0.003771237,0.004885396,0.0005054359],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00292297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002280539,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005058873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002981324,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9775753,0.01578039,0.001110725,0.001966037,0.002447257,0.001120326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9238045,0.0565964,0.007705648,0.008316393,0.002367429,0.001209702],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001275409,0.0001377671,0.0006415359,0.0002273695,0.00007739989,0.00007196041,0.0002800814,0.04898329,0.001047036,0.9329803,0.0004286569,0.01499708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005332011,0.0001690373,0.0001696952,0.00006311994,0.00003110517,0.00005760799,0.00004470819,0.103129,0.0009551678,0.8944799,0.0008214919,0.00002594729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02483921,0.0004982987,0.9688089,0.001287138,0.00004868262,0.0001538205,0.00008699032,0.0001373288,0.004139663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7355257,0.0008803445,0.2589084,0.0006134301,0.0003108855,0.0007777646,0.0001458328,0.00005954219,0.00277798],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02638409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.112513618562021,"score_gpt":0.1560837301711458,"score_spread":0.04357011160912476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}