{"id":"W2951144595","doi":"10.1080/10350330.2019.1587843","title":"A sociosemiotic interpretation of cybersecurity in U.S. legislative discourse","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Semiotics","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Referent; Cyberspace; Computer security; Legislature; Realm; Computer science; Critical infrastructure; Meaning (existential); Political science; Sociology; The Internet; Law; Linguistics; Epistemology; World Wide Web","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007527246,0.0001296024,0.0003548223,0.00008810151,0.0002544966,0.00002342367,0.0002156557,0.0001833153,0.0001596034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003023659,0.0001427369,0.0001505774,0.0004493381,0.0006518246,0.0002499236,0.00007804554,0.000280612,0.0000442053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002545958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002014533,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003701389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01871219,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983584,0.0003203748,0.0003230784,0.000216168,0.0004223049,0.0003597056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992404,0.0002837715,0.0001892359,0.0001069797,0.000129122,0.00005046557],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000466429,0.000158861,0.04599868,0.00004233793,0.00005636619,0.000002535214,0.7153674,0.00002251352,0.00004198039,0.2351352,0.0005768657,0.002550663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002306944,0.0002237614,0.08725703,0.0003977934,0.0001550158,6.066212e-7,0.7971046,0.0007910692,0.0001604211,0.09700115,0.01352317,0.001078451],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8455964,0.0001751192,0.00006090652,0.002070405,0.0006729347,0.0003823659,0.00001905442,0.00004176754,0.150981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988474,0.0001142387,0.00006933304,0.00009785414,0.0001715683,0.000004059588,0.00000629324,0.00001136456,0.0006779367],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1532509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991937,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01398926309716328,"score_gpt":0.3265566021586914,"score_spread":0.3125673390615282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}