{"id":"W2951270789","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avz015","title":"The Magnetism of Moral Reasoning and the Principle of Proportionality in Comparative Constitutional Adjudication","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Adjudication; Law; Constitutionality; Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Politics; Constitution; Political science; Law and economics; Normative; Moral reasoning; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001780774,0.00006820005,0.0003886506,0.00002170178,0.0004426782,0.00001603988,0.0002483481,0.00001050408,0.00001488336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004812976,0.00003223564,0.00006844892,0.0002706995,0.02022577,0.0001149743,0.00004714684,0.000163478,0.000001938133],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004066718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000341096,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001392531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008441227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982232,0.0006997982,0.0004390257,0.00006628845,0.0004592061,0.000112452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974951,0.0009597849,0.001009865,0.00007962293,0.000427793,0.00002788593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004649654,0.0000320987,0.02054494,0.00000120028,0.00006359869,2.474864e-7,0.005650715,0.0002361643,0.0000473841,0.9728014,0.00002300518,0.0001342992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001657661,0.0004360545,0.562017,0.0001664275,0.00007406182,0.00001881348,0.03488839,0.0002323574,0.0002863504,0.3894165,0.01066557,0.0001407764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9742074,0.001268935,0.0001322059,0.003155522,0.00007437201,0.0002702164,0.000006128175,0.000001727886,0.02088347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995317,0.0001792307,0.0001206477,0.00007990537,0.00005389248,0.000005627468,4.475547e-7,8.480083e-7,0.0000276699],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5833849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824406,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03932392676279167,"score_gpt":0.3511782601717788,"score_spread":0.3118543334089871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}