{"id":"W2951270789","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avz015","title":"The Magnetism of Moral Reasoning and the Principle of Proportionality in Comparative Constitutional Adjudication","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Adjudication; Law; Constitutionality; Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Politics; Constitution; Political science; Law and economics; Normative; Moral reasoning; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03745685,0.0003059796,0.000636435,0.002658445,0.005348068,0.008563916,0.001465853,0.002988879,0.003621424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04542461,0.0006041425,0.0007699692,0.001588409,0.06242848,0.01130382,0.007151204,0.006186367,0.0002904714],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009064019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00447506,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003590483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002597461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9461511,0.04683457,0.0009796212,0.001631422,0.003291886,0.001111415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9652945,0.02835685,0.001489958,0.002371753,0.001992967,0.0004939779],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004178784,0.000002033665,0.00003197692,0.000005321711,0.000001619329,0.000008309617,0.0003155112,0.00009093251,0.00001554239,0.9985822,0.0001352208,0.0008071458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001222274,0.000007635074,0.00008139614,0.00003180283,0.000003097153,0.00001483622,0.0001904746,0.000569245,0.00006381859,0.993986,0.005034355,0.000005133499],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08061337,0.005303319,0.2998407,0.05626556,0.00135115,0.0002181904,0.0001119777,0.0001068382,0.556189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748763,0.0004623822,0.01854806,0.00140402,0.0004419021,0.0001946025,0.00001950001,0.00002994649,0.004023338],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03745685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1980932,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03932392676279167,"score_gpt":0.3511782601717788,"score_spread":0.3118543334089871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}