{"id":"W2951417356","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1505.02140","title":"Towards the Formalization of Fractional Calculus in Higher-Order Logic","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Logic, programming, and type systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Generalization; Calculus (dental); Fractional calculus; Automated theorem proving; HOL; Computer science; Class (philosophy); Order (exchange); Mathematics; Algebra over a field; Theoretical computer science; Applied mathematics; Programming language; Pure mathematics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006658648,0.0008542528,0.0008950231,0.002485081,0.001615571,0.005565104,0.00268339,0.001446182,0.004473758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007037269,0.0005841667,0.002323342,0.00236844,0.006971645,0.00862819,0.003730038,0.007129006,0.001101046],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003267507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00251562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002048974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00158341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971786,0.001167547,0.0001755704,0.0002651768,0.0009789069,0.0002342314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958863,0.00223952,0.0003105457,0.0006837207,0.0007069507,0.0001729532],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005343752,0.00001430765,0.00004644457,0.00003288602,0.000005646242,0.00003299361,0.0001683688,0.001458859,0.0003696482,0.9935637,0.0005654084,0.003736363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001255661,0.000009305081,0.00004753738,0.00003898295,0.00001037228,0.00004937231,0.00006845292,0.01409728,0.0008532376,0.9675927,0.01720895,0.0000111723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008467525,0.001030458,0.9753135,0.002095956,0.0002668425,0.00006272797,0.0001499603,0.0004625698,0.01215051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2972966,0.002910786,0.6881921,0.001872195,0.0008824531,0.0002324288,0.0004861246,0.000505984,0.007621308],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006658648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03521472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1412607786547979,"score_gpt":0.2210357614021997,"score_spread":0.07977498274740186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}