{"id":"W2951427626","doi":"10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006180","title":"Atomic resolution mechanism of ligand binding to a solvent inaccessible cavity in T4 lysozyme","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Computational Biology","topic":"Protein Structure and Dynamics","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto","funders":"Division of Chemistry; Tata Institute of Fundamental Research","keywords":"Chemistry; Molecular dynamics; Ligand (biochemistry); Crystallography; Binding site; Chemical physics; Computational chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001235563,0.00009561848,0.000145096,0.0001188038,0.00004689521,0.000005513491,0.0001385837,0.0001438164,0.000006887543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006346674,0.0000925398,0.00003530782,0.0001434094,0.00007691971,0.000003360505,0.0001417833,0.00005518903,0.00001099593],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002974564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008552573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001118961,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992237,0.00005392686,0.0002186929,0.0002638873,0.00006689318,0.0001729134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996198,0.00001866184,0.00008609403,0.0001196053,0.0001125056,0.00004328862],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001336724,0.0000518444,0.004811381,0.00001315631,0.00003017882,9.61084e-7,0.00005667064,0.0005298807,0.9782259,0.01575446,0.00005227225,0.0003396052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001008543,0.001199785,0.009720489,0.00005189583,0.00001684229,0.00001756047,0.00003148531,0.01662173,0.8788961,0.09169869,0.0004219899,0.000314862],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9551502,0.00006284441,0.04417935,0.0001198207,0.0001035204,0.0001776767,0.00004276754,0.000007317395,0.0001564897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98904,0.000006852652,0.01037628,0.0001940102,0.0001280087,0.00001638373,0.0002110601,0.000008032884,0.00001935632],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09932979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3773663,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01336198135981673,"score_gpt":0.2739008695230695,"score_spread":0.2605388881632527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}