{"id":"W2951824380","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v8n4p13","title":"Economic Analysis of Optimal Sample Size in Legal Proceedings","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sample size determination; Sample (material); Stochastic game; Population size; Econometrics; Statistics; Population; Point estimation; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001024149,0.0000784283,0.0005807392,0.0003002239,0.00001290705,0.00007354326,0.0002277502,0.0000539439,0.0004913128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003742519,0.00009794019,0.0001175126,0.00008026695,0.00008530838,0.0002619447,0.00004538687,0.0001046427,0.00001029635],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002123331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005014837,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001767506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002813156,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983764,0.000008495693,0.001253998,0.0001919957,0.00005418975,0.0001149554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983445,0.0003223759,0.001037898,0.00007603454,0.0001632061,0.00005596282],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007520069,0.00005370133,0.6005602,0.00001999348,0.0003737241,0.000001187957,0.0002478092,0.001523821,0.000007281814,0.3968135,0.00005148756,0.0002720231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001020931,0.0001913808,0.576847,0.00002599241,0.00005259507,0.00000870555,0.00009779548,0.02042149,0.0000266955,0.3984279,0.002699399,0.0001800842],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921054,0.0001022511,0.00250827,0.0001860003,0.0006412491,0.0001116698,0.001400142,0.000001869508,0.002943147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918526,0.0001279071,0.0078461,0.00003557163,0.00009327775,0.000001640837,0.000007369416,0.000006463142,0.00002903027],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02371326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5379531,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01618967921628035,"score_gpt":0.2391045758622027,"score_spread":0.2229148966459223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}