{"id":"W2951849717","doi":"","title":"THE SUPREME COURT, FEDERALISM AND METAPHORS OF MODERATION","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Metaphor; Supreme court; Political science; Adjudication; Law; Ideal (ethics); Constitution; Democracy; Judicial review; Charter; Dual federalism; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Philosophy; History; Politics; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009113231,0.00004122487,0.0001117406,0.000003767652,0.0008005129,0.00005699739,0.0001447016,0.00002286382,0.0002881342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001211716,0.00002217728,0.00003323042,0.00006293027,0.000193195,0.00004734174,0.000003362691,0.00004702955,0.0000276766],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007256705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002470941,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8156655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9162502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992509,0.0002152836,0.0001314699,0.00005981118,0.0001503516,0.0001921628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995815,0.00006961967,0.00003491983,0.0001267236,0.00003042953,0.0001567682],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[5.416972e-7,0.000001160028,0.00004660263,0.00006122473,0.000009144345,6.306191e-7,0.0006196921,8.161527e-7,6.409462e-7,0.941862,0.02170512,0.03569242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001908281,0.000002859496,0.0008816395,0.0001797325,0.00001356409,8.801329e-7,0.00002020954,0.00001742496,9.825121e-7,0.002685443,0.9961459,0.00003224779],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02323518,0.3482653,0.000004127426,0.3580912,0.0001652011,0.001163271,0.00005999427,0.00001490344,0.2690009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8710325,0.1142165,0.000007192501,0.004394886,0.00009301803,0.0000152085,8.428306e-7,0.000004432643,0.01023545],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9744408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6156979,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02893120900932644,"score_gpt":0.2853290397411665,"score_spread":0.2563978307318401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}