{"id":"W2951849717","doi":"","title":"THE SUPREME COURT, FEDERALISM AND METAPHORS OF MODERATION","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Metaphor; Supreme court; Political science; Adjudication; Law; Ideal (ethics); Constitution; Democracy; Judicial review; Charter; Dual federalism; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Philosophy; History; Politics; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003337045,0.0003501129,0.0003894011,0.002331939,0.009286969,0.007266141,0.001065939,0.001927117,0.002864834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005086056,0.0002068478,0.0002535547,0.002739273,0.03547037,0.003777823,0.002199742,0.003056288,0.0002124402],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03213083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02142455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3901529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4354789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962829,0.002001809,0.00005266599,0.0002688527,0.0007505637,0.0006432352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983986,0.0009293503,0.0001416871,0.00008953136,0.0002937564,0.0001471125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002244619,7.296446e-7,0.00004392424,0.000007861315,9.01198e-7,0.000008661485,0.0009572554,0.00007250194,0.00002699487,0.9962206,0.001677459,0.0009808826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002106551,0.000009364286,0.001131764,0.00013144,0.00001154145,0.0000314492,0.002474024,0.0003935395,0.0001018527,0.762733,0.2329455,0.00001534597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04577236,0.05891576,0.01854128,0.1136353,0.0009969625,0.00004214087,0.0001582471,0.0001108591,0.7618271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768354,0.004834048,0.001183053,0.003507003,0.0002592764,0.00004057278,0.0000246031,0.00002252367,0.01329343],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9678692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.775764,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02893120900932644,"score_gpt":0.2853290397411665,"score_spread":0.2563978307318401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}