{"id":"W2951872363","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2018-0767","title":"Review of the fire risk, hazard, and thermomechanical response of bridges in fire","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Fire effects on concrete materials","field":"Engineering","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bridge (graph theory); Fire hazard; Hazard; Fire safety; Fire performance; Forensic engineering; Fire resistance; Engineering; Fire protection; Fire protection engineering; Variety (cybernetics); Civil engineering; Architectural engineering; Computer science; Environmental science; Environmental protection","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001989562,0.0006358681,0.001265081,0.005242687,0.0004121776,0.001382402,0.000879271,0.001035588,0.002828705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006319657,0.0004194867,0.0009372766,0.006050311,0.0005481001,0.001469362,0.0005051772,0.0006867439,0.0004639372],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001908331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006760709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0150907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0383173,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988872,0.0002855539,0.0002636359,0.0001060456,0.0004028664,0.00005471638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993376,0.004234692,0.0007541038,0.00009096458,0.001422023,0.0001223316],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001032698,0.00007163188,0.001139835,0.1941181,0.0004542549,0.0002783141,0.0008550031,0.001372663,0.001362003,0.006089678,0.04802521,0.7461299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001162324,0.0002281859,0.009545147,0.1391407,0.001050773,0.0007692211,0.0009004967,0.0002993521,0.000646333,0.002169861,0.8451898,0.00004856043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003923131,0.9978244,0.0001518006,0.0004708206,0.000222965,0.000008408418,0.00005205044,0.000002960535,0.0008742138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002564923,0.9965512,0.0002079658,0.0001989903,0.0001247779,0.000007111647,0.00004860197,0.000001456883,0.0002949874],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0150907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03000575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004328187365005019,"score_gpt":0.1771546816188967,"score_spread":0.1728264942538917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}