{"id":"W2952126714","doi":"","title":"Litigation Risk Assessment: A Tool to Enhance Negotiation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Negotiation; Settlement (finance); Obligation; Presumption; Outcome (game theory); Litigation risk analysis; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Point (geometry); Public relations; Law; Sociology; Economics; Accounting; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04295836,0.002494068,0.001545207,0.009920791,0.002970516,0.01341514,0.003684438,0.003432358,0.02021327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1647028,0.001394835,0.001483275,0.003426209,0.002999333,0.02193235,0.01281951,0.005044416,0.005131622],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001794773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002858223,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007065672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001009171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9679083,0.02032208,0.002501706,0.002339987,0.00618389,0.0007439601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8339062,0.1364113,0.009600058,0.009868592,0.007736566,0.00247721],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009579178,0.0007309975,0.007226262,0.001277556,0.0001962381,0.001024484,0.03578008,0.01577799,0.008006042,0.2261543,0.02377199,0.6790962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003892615,0.0007523001,0.00522888,0.00220344,0.0002801936,0.001918815,0.009853535,0.2219082,0.01367239,0.5482131,0.1949003,0.0006797001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.013943,0.0002724678,0.9516727,0.002714797,0.0001717131,0.0007369,0.000291644,0.00898324,0.02121356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1256335,0.0002268745,0.8684595,0.0003291882,0.0001367794,0.0007192167,0.0002630814,0.000765235,0.003466557],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04295836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2271882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01147344321171349,"score_gpt":0.2515301512480214,"score_spread":0.2400567080363079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}