{"id":"W2952268257","doi":"10.82308/29171","title":"Understanding judicial appointments reform: comparing Australia, Canada and the United States","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Nomination; Judicial reform; Political science; Appeal; Politics; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Judicial discretion; Judicial independence; Law; Power (physics); Judicial opinion; Public administration","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00163534,0.0001560166,0.0004787089,0.003017701,0.008194197,0.006481615,0.001185332,0.001284857,0.004261977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008996701,0.0001598668,0.0002298661,0.005872218,0.007006529,0.002268475,0.002287795,0.00187203,0.0001857824],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1117201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1115703,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9863478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9935451,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966345,0.0004042635,0.00005658196,0.000207506,0.001088055,0.001609109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958372,0.0007882615,0.0005174007,0.0001215662,0.001899099,0.0008365516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000211294,0.0002071902,0.1653644,0.0003051328,0.0001147183,0.0008203153,0.1368642,0.004129437,0.000766794,0.5920098,0.0204069,0.07879969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008038668,0.0000831655,0.6351868,0.0006124934,0.0002220869,0.00009838799,0.1871181,0.004698551,0.0004743371,0.0289542,0.1423759,0.00009549359],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8045784,0.003328617,0.0003915998,0.0145443,0.00005391452,0.00006696103,0.0002784356,0.00001656634,0.1767412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926,0.00121148,0.0001352495,0.0009811666,0.00001077,0.00001954586,0.00008215705,0.000005661429,0.004954092],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8882799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8105897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09584545262438166,"score_gpt":0.2715764220700784,"score_spread":0.1757309694456967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}