{"id":"W2952662149","doi":"10.1101/379008","title":"Trends and perspectives on the use of social network analysis in behavioural ecology: a bibliometric approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Social network analysis; Social network (sociolinguistics); Network analysis; Data science; Dynamic network analysis; Organizational network analysis; Computer science; Network science; Complex network; Sociology; Social science; World Wide Web; Psychology; Social media; Knowledge management; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03996123,0.0007568867,0.002354558,0.2104653,0.001348524,0.008907695,0.001470973,0.001136146,0.002920375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1802386,0.0004754902,0.002187346,0.2461856,0.002129296,0.008095874,0.003525502,0.001147149,0.0005510928],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002907651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004090938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005078562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009190632,"domain_scores_codex":[0.958114,0.01360246,0.010748,0.004196131,0.01237149,0.0009678595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6245908,0.2680569,0.0598537,0.009533626,0.03517042,0.002794556],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003837073,0.00012478,0.4683335,0.07902382,0.008374431,0.0007196441,0.01175719,0.00289038,0.003806576,0.01992862,0.02367241,0.3809851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007237017,0.0002774277,0.7404572,0.03759632,0.006033906,0.001990973,0.01517714,0.009113763,0.002648766,0.02219334,0.1641006,0.0003382736],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3922832,0.4790649,0.02171825,0.02545304,0.001413489,0.0008398446,0.04800922,0.0007724028,0.03044569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8344321,0.1246035,0.02015861,0.001490374,0.001574672,0.001157118,0.01519234,0.0002294146,0.00116198],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9600388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2113377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06701594380724435,"score_gpt":0.2521050699271547,"score_spread":0.1850891261199104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}