{"id":"W2952722397","doi":"","title":"Airborne Laser Scanning Outperforms the Alternative 3D Techniques in Capturing Variation in Tree Height and Forest Density in Southern Boreal Forests","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Basal area; Lidar; Remote sensing; Point cloud; Laser scanning; Vegetation (pathology); Taiga; Forest inventory; Environmental science; Forest structure; Scale (ratio); Tree (set theory); Geography; Forest management; Mathematics; Forestry; Cartography; Canopy; Laser; Computer science; Agroforestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005666541,0.0001717855,0.0001711316,0.0001220413,0.0001394461,0.00004768345,0.000202384,0.00009450447,0.0000230168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004058044,0.0001289859,0.00002560045,0.0003818637,0.0002702192,0.0001932655,0.000164796,0.0002578931,0.00005035422],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000273923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001364256,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03040023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1906419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986798,0.00007845453,0.0002972638,0.0003838101,0.0002210792,0.0003396265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994751,0.00006665644,0.00009795569,0.000291384,0.00001225599,0.00005667878],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007045642,0.0001210216,0.9253385,0.000006950564,0.000007418852,0.00001688319,0.01840031,0.001896788,0.001137783,0.0003013211,0.0001089969,0.05259357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003997749,0.00004613135,0.9624215,0.0000529421,0.000005589083,0.000008003686,0.0003991518,0.03233503,0.001998801,0.001791469,0.0003738948,0.0001676785],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989853,0.00001537743,0.0007666385,0.0004432675,0.00003481287,0.0004310741,0.000003680243,0.0000408234,0.008411375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983723,0.00001115964,0.001186716,0.0001745429,0.00008705231,0.00001742011,0.000007168067,0.00001931165,0.0001242978],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1602416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9760564,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00839081134128253,"score_gpt":0.2246714474096234,"score_spread":0.2162806360683408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}