{"id":"W2952780795","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1207.1077","title":"On the mixing set with a knapsack constraint","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Risk and Portfolio Optimization","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Knapsack problem; Cardinality (data modeling); Mathematics; Continuous knapsack problem; Constraint (computer-aided design); Combinatorics; Set (abstract data type); Mixing (physics); Polytope; Class (philosophy); Discrete mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005503535,0.002057018,0.001558097,0.001847627,0.001692528,0.004836774,0.002126915,0.002507885,0.01172589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02692599,0.001138931,0.002289356,0.002415678,0.003944729,0.01013271,0.004234998,0.006745961,0.001344769],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002286193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00159102,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00190942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001265868,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938956,0.002519212,0.0003292571,0.001033983,0.001556484,0.0006655174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843078,0.01189124,0.001228389,0.001010192,0.0009133136,0.0006489297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007393061,0.00004347408,0.0003649143,0.0001035902,0.00003885925,0.0001373872,0.0001237326,0.05902849,0.001004101,0.9275011,0.001418788,0.01016151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002031955,0.000050403,0.0002217711,0.00007952846,0.00002185352,0.00007093538,0.00005218146,0.2651298,0.001029021,0.7304189,0.002873275,0.00003204277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03418028,0.001010685,0.930456,0.001687563,0.0001267902,0.00009767101,0.0003879684,0.0001100562,0.03194296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7005997,0.002616925,0.2738599,0.001341874,0.0006881107,0.0006821804,0.001317474,0.0004125958,0.01848116],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01172589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03922707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1307119423795123,"score_gpt":0.4135485694157115,"score_spread":0.2828366270361992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}