{"id":"W2952901605","doi":"10.7717/peerj.6702","title":"The cases for and against double-blind reviews","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PeerJ","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ibis; Double blind; Sociobiology; Gender bias; Psychology; Behavioral ecology; Disadvantaged; Ecology; Social psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Political science; Biology; Alternative medicine; Law; Anthropology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7582632,0.003064142,0.006318566,0.01497798,0.0094775,0.02447245,0.008904277,0.03150424,0.00885096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8941369,0.004354701,0.006266246,0.01116907,0.04044399,0.03209364,0.01746617,0.0227158,0.006888519],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009570141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02442237,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002128456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002535735,"domain_scores_codex":[0.106568,0.6006132,0.1145292,0.03220598,0.1416326,0.00445105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.02797777,0.6718896,0.1205865,0.1014633,0.07265421,0.005428579],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002234506,0.0001947381,0.01647467,0.04795451,0.003162386,0.002478543,0.03784887,0.0004695475,0.0022051,0.2368176,0.3057093,0.3444503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009890287,0.0002919949,0.007081991,0.06988087,0.001342872,0.005251122,0.005866738,0.0024355,0.003399461,0.1515333,0.7513304,0.000596744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01170307,0.1311076,0.1279866,0.5940227,0.07216632,0.005685885,0.0009904376,0.001549667,0.05478775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2366828,0.05773202,0.306018,0.3079924,0.05300356,0.02187511,0.0006311889,0.002384326,0.01368063],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2417368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2981046,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8242740004907603,"score_gpt":0.6397900203902531,"score_spread":0.1844839801005072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}