{"id":"W2952901605","doi":"10.7717/peerj.6702","title":"The cases for and against double-blind reviews","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PeerJ","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ibis; Double blind; Sociobiology; Gender bias; Psychology; Behavioral ecology; Disadvantaged; Ecology; Social psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Political science; Biology; Alternative medicine; Law; Anthropology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0210159,0.00007812163,0.0002067121,0.006412955,0.0003138599,0.0022386,0.001042824,0.00004341102,0.0001061077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02091678,0.00003670504,0.0001029363,0.03503336,0.000083207,0.0002214225,0.0003027845,0.00009414507,0.0006342152],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001987644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005228708,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000162966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000189296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964062,0.00007006936,0.0003818244,0.0003912958,0.002408187,0.0003424287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896855,0.008379511,0.000135302,0.0005989911,0.001027138,0.0001735606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002612386,0.00003027143,0.03298873,0.00001250698,0.00000743482,0.000002450331,0.00006532553,0.000002643441,0.0003974556,0.003207639,0.1367998,0.8262245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001281343,0.00008218506,0.006323338,0.000004191736,0.000002045968,0.000004226338,0.00008572764,0.0008687726,0.0001841932,0.00188789,0.9892058,0.00007032985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9542844,0.02203081,0.0005539535,0.004334552,0.00098275,0.001561291,0.00002391751,0.00001321364,0.01621506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9346438,0.007765525,0.0007951375,0.000453517,0.0001645109,0.00008867921,0.000004405437,0.00001116814,0.05607324],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.852406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987972,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8242740004907603,"score_gpt":0.6397900203902531,"score_spread":0.1844839801005072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}