{"id":"W2953156344","doi":"10.82308/51410","title":"Inviting judicial review: A comprehensive analysis of Canadian appellate court reference cases","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Newfoundland and Labrador","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Political science; Politics; Law; Delegation; Judicial review; Delegate; Government (linguistics); Separation of powers; Standard of review; Legislation; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01008339,0.001026518,0.001205544,0.02033796,0.01798883,0.01569252,0.004561558,0.00442907,0.007755962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04750625,0.0009367106,0.001650966,0.0287177,0.007487722,0.002887823,0.00279411,0.00275593,0.0007655305],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2053106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3034367,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967961,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9653017,0.002696417,0.0008174297,0.001423216,0.02119495,0.008566219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9636202,0.01250665,0.002711464,0.001136405,0.01785574,0.002169498],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001241313,0.0001444458,0.03107406,0.001173359,0.0002490433,0.002310749,0.02587468,0.007622475,0.0006825575,0.7520456,0.09812602,0.08057294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001479637,0.0001366054,0.2508837,0.002846164,0.001300666,0.001382119,0.04334072,0.01092051,0.001059243,0.07500149,0.6123922,0.0005885539],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.26385,0.04601578,0.003891107,0.0223696,0.0002818998,0.0009778157,0.004490593,0.000192448,0.6579308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9115028,0.02216818,0.003055217,0.004456376,0.0001737914,0.0003212773,0.001781455,0.0000821022,0.05645883],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7946894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9217271,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06615853605251082,"score_gpt":0.2924509033827958,"score_spread":0.226292367330285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}