{"id":"W2953272550","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1106.5068","title":"Cayley's hyperdeterminant: a combinatorial approach via representation theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Tensor decomposition and applications","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Invariant (physics); Enumeration; Combinatorics; Integer (computer science); Representation theory; Polynomial; Homogeneous; Simple (philosophy); Algebra over a field; Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002596236,0.0003099956,0.0004068143,0.0001800582,0.0002018144,0.00004437676,0.0006375865,0.000370566,0.0001756819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005299634,0.0003489726,0.0002795709,0.0002665956,0.0001586781,0.0001152784,0.0005109566,0.000526063,0.0001292552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001240924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005901272,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008485469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005912209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982687,0.0002645067,0.0002835438,0.0008308873,0.0000923206,0.0002600204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978989,0.0002293673,0.00036411,0.00119495,0.0001666266,0.0001460052],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001025088,0.000502858,0.0002466002,0.000111889,0.0001089734,0.00003341343,0.0005744573,0.0004401241,0.0000990093,0.9970773,0.0005106066,0.0001922165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007093943,0.00002661432,0.0003043742,0.00003766138,0.0003287064,0.0000117901,0.0002532123,0.01149895,0.0005680606,0.9857287,0.0001307711,0.000401811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5932984,0.00001561857,0.353251,0.00002457194,0.0006871885,0.0009874195,0.00005083099,0.000441308,0.05124366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940574,0.00002737146,0.003124163,0.00002960559,0.000150444,0.00001136367,0.00008135708,0.0000468468,0.00247141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.400759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.147733690261335,"score_gpt":0.2433556358664301,"score_spread":0.09562194560509515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}