{"id":"W2953363180","doi":"","title":"Personal trainers and their clients: Preliminary evidence of the role of relational efficacies in predicting self-efficacy and intention to return","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Proxy (statistics); Psychology; Self-efficacy; Multilevel model; Social psychology; Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Applied psychology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004108844,0.0002492268,0.0002794357,0.0005679422,0.0005366675,0.001164448,0.000479002,0.0005048533,0.006500933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01738342,0.0003361864,0.0002706946,0.0003843172,0.0006952189,0.0006230702,0.0008233614,0.001368726,0.0005133235],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005676132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006992105,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00481599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007510272,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986448,0.0005634217,0.0001013665,0.0001378073,0.0003793525,0.0001733117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865962,0.006848601,0.003352544,0.000670694,0.0004989277,0.002033121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001216376,0.00064963,0.9831932,0.00003000388,0.00004812565,0.00005351235,0.002538773,0.0001039634,0.000187825,0.0001767708,0.00007988912,0.01281663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008517684,0.0001924208,0.99679,0.00002756337,0.00003501966,0.0001245204,0.00170262,0.0005876129,0.0001540245,0.000157192,0.0002147019,0.000005654986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982933,0.00009148866,0.0001563819,0.00007294229,0.000001714444,0.00001361642,0.00001691323,0.000002316824,0.001351323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989628,0.0001025603,0.0001846783,0.00002282725,0.000002585235,0.00001897891,0.00002799756,0.000001670734,0.0006759674],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006500933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02174777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02089252980625319,"score_gpt":0.3307413324250481,"score_spread":0.3098488026187949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}