{"id":"W2953681989","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2018-0480","title":"Developing landscape connectivity in commercial boreal forests using minimum spanning tree and spatial optimization","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Landscape connectivity; Taiga; Habitat; Adjacency list; Boreal; Minimum spanning tree; Spanning tree; Net present value; Computer science; Environmental science; Ecology; Geography; Forestry; Mathematics; Biology; Algorithm; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005473364,0.0004550669,0.0003873832,0.0008700677,0.0003733775,0.0004512238,0.0004877283,0.0003654519,0.001133812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001534797,0.0003575287,0.0005173772,0.0007361131,0.0002736961,0.0008182704,0.000437677,0.0002476153,0.00007178404],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006170362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007625946,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01215672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02092759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998211,0.00006710489,0.00001021054,0.00004014004,0.00003676203,0.00002470674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995046,0.0003076753,0.00007666221,0.00002059288,0.00006407989,0.00002643033],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000192151,0.00002572065,0.003064825,0.0000310423,0.00002119683,0.00004807977,0.00003134634,0.9698896,0.0006972569,0.00278249,0.000181984,0.02320733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004761751,0.00002183223,0.0008146016,0.000004525873,0.000007946404,0.00002546237,0.00002608241,0.9965701,0.0003132494,0.001905974,0.0003021669,0.000003182786],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.255692,0.0002587884,0.7386662,0.0001219756,0.00001600634,0.00009773665,0.0002035166,0.0002731106,0.004670644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6706572,0.0001524547,0.3278085,0.00002408901,0.00001133709,0.00009303358,0.0002562346,0.00006740478,0.0009297287],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9878433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02417195,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07517415601627563,"score_gpt":0.2899763942581748,"score_spread":0.2148022382418991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}