{"id":"W2953684232","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2019.04.373","title":"PCN252 QUALITY EVALUATION OF PHARMACOECONOMIC STUDIES IN RUSSIAN CANCER RESEARCH: AN OUTSIDE VIEW","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Value in Health","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Medicine; Quality (philosophy); Economic evaluation; Actuarial science; Medical physics; Family medicine; Computer science; Pathology; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1379153,0.0005273897,0.001978398,0.005734869,0.001013947,0.006732877,0.001288733,0.00102033,0.004370203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25076,0.0003148471,0.0015339,0.00939879,0.001940197,0.002017861,0.003117408,0.001303159,0.0003092306],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01090669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01958412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02049416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01406527,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8257785,0.1401888,0.01099274,0.002340328,0.01901675,0.001682882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7059531,0.1687246,0.03498923,0.01605199,0.06692308,0.00735802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007991769,0.0003734501,0.1925625,0.0134854,0.008026691,0.0001913744,0.001609555,0.01344164,0.0008946205,0.08757197,0.03903744,0.6348135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001949176,0.003020629,0.6370988,0.02234416,0.009104229,0.0006326247,0.002527597,0.02211796,0.005182051,0.06412631,0.2315812,0.0003151959],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2582221,0.3685283,0.05099617,0.1159512,0.004222535,0.003455711,0.03043786,0.0002118843,0.1679743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9508649,0.01853475,0.01576405,0.00350665,0.001462237,0.001182069,0.005798285,0.000113924,0.002773174],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8620847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7293746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9294760374727394,"score_gpt":0.6743938392265685,"score_spread":0.255082198246171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}