{"id":"W2954455586","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2019.04.1777","title":"PSS5 THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF HALOBETASOL PROPIONATE (0.01%) AND TAZAROTENE (0.045%) FIXED COMBINATION RELATIVE TO OTHER TOPICAL THERAPIES IN MODERATE-TO-SEVERE PLAQUE PSORIASIS: A CANADIAN ANALYSIS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Value in Health","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Bausch Health (Canada); Health Canada; Vancouver Coastal Health","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Tazarotene; Plaque psoriasis; Reimbursement; Psoriasis; Relative risk; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Internal medicine; Cost effectiveness; Dermatology; Health care; Confidence interval","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003670515,0.001072632,0.001807435,0.002212049,0.0005769317,0.00168028,0.001741748,0.0008670453,0.007740968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01545144,0.0006001564,0.006859642,0.003937167,0.0006043303,0.0005927526,0.0006992056,0.001763292,0.0002496535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03794948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03292286,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9533285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9395751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997243,0.001229803,0.0002324934,0.0002033258,0.0007101513,0.0003811034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951154,0.002271026,0.0007832833,0.0001689413,0.00108892,0.0005724343],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.1709524,0.001113007,0.1607058,0.0210434,0.05746202,0.0009848381,0.0005330128,0.2568235,0.00232093,0.02237031,0.08799333,0.2176976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07469802,0.01211431,0.5771243,0.00610011,0.08471238,0.001260182,0.001719376,0.1818406,0.002531197,0.008232451,0.04890517,0.0007618821],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.747032,0.08739502,0.003693401,0.005242154,0.0004877088,0.002181164,0.1180356,0.0002260023,0.03570683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703557,0.01085567,0.001599217,0.0003407346,0.00006143703,0.0001521256,0.01208887,0.00003924287,0.004506893],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04667151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2753441,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2077332866101929,"score_gpt":0.3820758631588717,"score_spread":0.1743425765486788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}