{"id":"W2954648193","doi":"10.5194/hess-23-4323-2019","title":"Technical note: Inherent benchmark or not? Comparing Nash–Sutcliffe and Kling–Gupta efficiency scores","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hydrology and earth system sciences","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1322,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Benchmark (surveying); Metric (unit); Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Econometrics; Engineering; Operations management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0177878306016739,"score_gpt":0.2415942513588963,"score_spread":0.2238064207572223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}