{"id":"W2955158141","doi":"10.1051/e3sconf/20199218007","title":"Importance of coherence between geophysical and geotechnical data in dynamic response analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E3S Web of Conferences","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Hydro-Québec; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Wave velocity; Liquefaction; Geotechnical engineering; Geology; Geotechnical investigation; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Geophysics; Shear (geology); Earthquake engineering; Seismology; Field (mathematics); Ground motion; Response analysis; Engineering; Structural engineering; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006293667,0.0006737576,0.0005717948,0.002457287,0.000426152,0.001622131,0.0004849776,0.0009387643,0.00100955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02309421,0.0003737122,0.0004080666,0.002508077,0.0009356876,0.002166138,0.001463164,0.0008318143,0.0003536034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004203095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001129761,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006689169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007426517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958999,0.002036298,0.0003920197,0.0005333217,0.0009071243,0.0002313512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871482,0.008418066,0.001290123,0.00130664,0.001676663,0.0001602981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001077724,0.0006033173,0.2088449,0.0008430405,0.0004953908,0.00138762,0.002247097,0.2607434,0.08485716,0.01948046,0.001908766,0.4175112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008507095,0.0006218285,0.2162943,0.0002918011,0.0002026288,0.0006062973,0.002431231,0.7367989,0.02167173,0.0142497,0.006549787,0.0001967335],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3002499,0.0006536247,0.6924516,0.0004462598,0.00004760802,0.0001642025,0.0006687884,0.0005714395,0.004746585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9349447,0.0002120537,0.06365924,0.00007092457,0.00003652127,0.00009247255,0.0005022879,0.0001143045,0.0003674882],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006689169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03328449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01170781841826791,"score_gpt":0.244814828675246,"score_spread":0.2331070102569781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}