{"id":"W2955238354","doi":"10.1177/1755088219860858","title":"Potentiality, political protest and constituent power: A response to the special issue","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Opposition (politics); Epistemology; Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Social science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01295513,0.001324439,0.002392265,0.003490118,0.008635022,0.01664442,0.004269449,0.02231544,0.006058811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02672595,0.0008980866,0.001925806,0.004257673,0.02484915,0.02323507,0.01030642,0.03832651,0.001316483],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006574936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006799229,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003195612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00585284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920744,0.003798933,0.000552869,0.00125792,0.001423898,0.0008919468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9738429,0.01986936,0.001036131,0.0008659443,0.002911835,0.001473841],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002751909,0.00006329217,0.0003852098,0.0002185539,0.00001146021,0.0002017203,0.003626293,0.0001286455,0.00006056945,0.1528005,0.8327937,0.009682582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002260679,0.00004040411,0.001178613,0.0006893631,0.00001740769,0.0004028565,0.007683877,0.0005743893,0.00007400234,0.08986098,0.8993903,0.00006523408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001099401,0.01648137,0.0007731219,0.8696151,0.1058567,0.00001780766,0.0000443518,0.00002383702,0.006088311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05004961,0.03751294,0.002268221,0.3963733,0.4927496,0.0002623148,0.0001639949,0.0002764974,0.02034355],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02231544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06851411,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01223956724919104,"score_gpt":0.3298534615171496,"score_spread":0.3176138942679585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}