{"id":"W2955520961","doi":"10.1109/lcsys.2019.2922105","title":"MinMax Mean-Field Team Approach for a Leader–Follower Network: A Saddle-Point Strategy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Control Systems Letters","topic":"Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Concordia University","keywords":"Saddle point; Minimax; Mean field theory; Saddle; Mathematics; Robustness (evolution); Field (mathematics); Control theory (sociology); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Control (management); Physics; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002143101,0.0006884341,0.001312804,0.0001990039,0.0002197652,0.000920013,0.002141424,0.0003382562,0.000006862387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008512681,0.0006246353,0.0006066589,0.0004462356,0.00005011061,0.0009108126,0.0000828953,0.0004077253,0.0002628332],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003692958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000166754,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003895516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002095534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941533,0.0004686153,0.001233433,0.001403755,0.001065333,0.001675624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960627,0.0007590553,0.0006667877,0.001855306,0.0003178602,0.0003382702],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005018709,0.00038542,0.001513691,0.0009296957,0.00159503,0.00005188316,0.00107237,0.4519522,0.07620435,0.01369823,0.4493093,0.002785911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01018796,0.0004645256,0.00007647605,0.0002366299,0.000107344,0.00008943903,0.0003503165,0.9625649,0.0001715591,0.00003361908,0.02464908,0.001068185],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00555862,0.0008574369,0.9746034,0.001831837,0.006494128,0.005886694,0.00006343961,0.0005296601,0.004174753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899276,0.000001800192,0.001552868,0.004470226,0.001531399,0.00139106,0.00002287356,0.0000743022,0.001027849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.984369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996205,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0174655998382354,"score_gpt":0.2222001312651696,"score_spread":0.2047345314269342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}