{"id":"W2955784817","doi":"","title":"Epistemic and Deontic Authority in the Argumentum Ad Verecundiam","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Deontic logic; Argumentation theory; Ambiguity; Epistemology; Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Fallacy; Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01546586,0.0008001366,0.0009806537,0.003201187,0.004852658,0.009406985,0.001498815,0.004956863,0.00389785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02843982,0.0007000957,0.001353778,0.001806002,0.02069562,0.02158169,0.006212757,0.005392293,0.0004723933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004236304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001915838,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001751616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001264647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9820454,0.01239942,0.00083072,0.001324065,0.002434082,0.000966284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851438,0.01118187,0.000855686,0.001150871,0.001180732,0.0004870201],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009030267,0.000002818067,0.00004202126,0.00001204027,0.00000186807,0.00003304039,0.0008980628,0.0001503531,0.00007096207,0.9976631,0.00009560317,0.001020938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001224384,0.00001271724,0.0001042511,0.00004604223,0.00000628497,0.00006318508,0.000514784,0.00214588,0.0001873725,0.9873114,0.009582801,0.00001317152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1515488,0.005774371,0.4877873,0.01714971,0.001200853,0.000291394,0.0001458955,0.0001763407,0.3359253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9402986,0.0005544474,0.04992734,0.0004718521,0.0001678282,0.0001641994,0.00005635969,0.00005494219,0.00830443],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01546586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08179224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01010453961178445,"score_gpt":0.2337601388731791,"score_spread":0.2236555992613947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}