{"id":"W2955784817","doi":"","title":"Epistemic and Deontic Authority in the Argumentum Ad Verecundiam","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Deontic logic; Argumentation theory; Ambiguity; Epistemology; Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Fallacy; Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002599116,0.00009374262,0.0001067648,0.00008167839,0.0001470509,0.0001058918,0.0004882882,0.00004396898,0.000003626628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004382231,0.00005000114,0.00004164196,0.0001427232,0.00002020379,0.000398966,0.00004349857,0.0004604994,0.00002463846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003510005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005726716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007797613,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981553,0.0002394449,0.0002287777,0.000184117,0.0002318046,0.0009605383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994976,0.0000961809,0.0001232999,0.0002125195,0.00002512929,0.00004530732],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001680638,0.00009557881,0.02482357,0.00001327937,0.00005113272,0.00001424422,0.001561404,0.000001689339,0.002793262,0.6852051,0.0001796888,0.2852442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003451471,0.000638652,0.1467445,0.0002416206,0.00002692786,0.002523491,0.0009547613,0.002701296,0.0003048551,0.8350381,0.006851898,0.0005224965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6264404,0.003051997,0.3614828,0.008182112,0.0004190176,0.0002018627,5.349239e-7,0.00002584853,0.0001953634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997659,0.001626624,0.000177516,0.00006247411,0.00008324566,0.000005682809,1.497357e-7,0.000004349166,0.0003810162],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3712185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2038987,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01010453961178445,"score_gpt":0.2337601388731791,"score_spread":0.2236555992613947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}