{"id":"W2955873301","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03146-4","title":"The citation advantage of foreign language references for Chinese social science papers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences; China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Citation; Internationalization; Foreign language; Citation index; Impact factor; Scientific communication; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Social science; Consumption (sociology); Artifact (error); Scientometrics; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Computer science; Library science; Political science; Law; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003711875,0.0004561404,0.0009270399,0.02705579,0.00129266,0.004783222,0.0007736175,0.0008365059,0.006978991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02236736,0.0001257901,0.001090664,0.02866217,0.0006717565,0.003162649,0.001459868,0.0005156379,0.001387159],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001988849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002356488,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008623037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01114806,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972217,0.0003655839,0.0004476258,0.000465943,0.001141574,0.000357648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804038,0.008004749,0.003515391,0.0009385447,0.005673644,0.001463837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001069716,0.0001896163,0.7911611,0.001965086,0.00199602,0.001897414,0.003793922,0.001435074,0.01196958,0.01299257,0.007975752,0.1635541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000780219,0.0003097383,0.9603936,0.0001669871,0.002385328,0.001354081,0.002490756,0.003538411,0.004658825,0.006356288,0.01815698,0.0001109546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9642742,0.01100415,0.0007115857,0.0006827139,0.0003927803,0.00001654646,0.003911747,0.0001080631,0.01889822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935596,0.001674102,0.0003239057,0.00004847045,0.0003961754,0.000008892184,0.001664182,0.00001937682,0.002305388],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02334702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3454218329475817,"score_gpt":0.5814282516665357,"score_spread":0.236006418718954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}