{"id":"W2955873301","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03146-4","title":"The citation advantage of foreign language references for Chinese social science papers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences; China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Citation; Internationalization; Foreign language; Citation index; Impact factor; Scientific communication; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Social science; Consumption (sociology); Artifact (error); Scientometrics; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Computer science; Library science; Political science; Law; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06217872,0.0001745233,0.000344946,0.08917785,0.001152655,0.002749981,0.005249787,0.00009178874,0.0001647497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1168869,0.00009311091,0.00023739,0.5141261,0.001135506,0.00100367,0.0007369544,0.0001906312,0.00012322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001779929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005065523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001615571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007617001,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9795215,0.0001246619,0.0008243346,0.000902685,0.01764541,0.000981442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799633,0.01144991,0.0006208788,0.0008780792,0.006773902,0.0003139054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001047971,0.0001741139,0.3807469,0.0000322318,0.00001857458,0.000001287113,0.001932533,0.00003345981,0.0406542,0.0649887,0.002147978,0.5091652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00177451,0.0008786184,0.8985406,0.00001215722,0.00001349753,0.000003686072,0.01962247,0.01094957,0.007718425,0.02586209,0.03410206,0.0005222947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9018667,0.0006149067,0.001332758,0.0002474152,0.001475652,0.0006967943,0.00009095738,0.00002263836,0.09365218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944675,0.00007381278,0.001017826,0.00005806816,0.00007487888,0.00001932473,0.000005186096,0.00001036454,0.004273013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5177937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982852,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3454218329475817,"score_gpt":0.5814282516665357,"score_spread":0.236006418718954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}