{"id":"W2956053547","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1127","title":"Compensating for Innovation: Extreme Product Incongruity Encourages Consumers to Affirm Unrelated Consumption Schemas","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Psychology; Moderation; Social psychology; Consumption (sociology); Product (mathematics); Preference; Ethnocentrism; Cognitive psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014841,0.0002805354,0.0005322771,0.00123229,0.0001901121,0.0001987064,0.0003856808,0.0001550592,0.001761177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000543075,0.0002741072,0.0001658472,0.0008991185,0.0001404953,0.000964938,0.00007233059,0.0003836772,0.00157881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006178227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009287689,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002390988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003232061,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974112,0.00005213605,0.00135277,0.000444679,0.0003686766,0.0003705478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958339,0.0001926701,0.001455882,0.0004417394,0.00203268,0.00004307095],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009877109,0.0003808051,0.6908437,0.0002986969,0.0002789766,0.00001163971,0.0001201924,0.00002132247,0.1046153,0.007728919,0.02766173,0.167051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005482654,0.00005487218,0.5951256,0.0002389247,0.000347964,0.0001253869,0.0001829913,0.0001708481,0.001003666,0.0008320641,0.3958311,0.0006038849],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.988029,0.0005104305,0.001642475,0.003415522,0.004220971,0.001037724,0.000007510469,0.00005860941,0.001077758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948331,0.00004926508,0.001711561,0.002293294,0.0003464878,0.00003957731,0.00003380782,0.00003868578,0.0006542713],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3681694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09975593168979328,"score_gpt":0.3436611381830093,"score_spread":0.243905206493216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}