{"id":"W2956053547","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1127","title":"Compensating for Innovation: Extreme Product Incongruity Encourages Consumers to Affirm Unrelated Consumption Schemas","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Psychology; Moderation; Social psychology; Consumption (sociology); Product (mathematics); Preference; Ethnocentrism; Cognitive psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00130071,0.0002137585,0.0001548516,0.000219983,0.000365433,0.0008485383,0.0001581258,0.0004609647,0.002297741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005020197,0.0001502878,0.0001784735,0.0001163204,0.000679162,0.0005833575,0.0009948001,0.000820871,0.0001237788],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001626906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002096917,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002241185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003231083,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992986,0.0003032676,0.00003603679,0.00008231142,0.0002132137,0.00006654902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969387,0.001622305,0.0006609612,0.0004065766,0.0001030265,0.0002684087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004124278,0.008614508,0.2793095,0.0005092973,0.000200213,0.001125004,0.02182281,0.001485146,0.5233071,0.01213039,0.001462694,0.1459091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002994633,0.005749606,0.9136376,0.00008147849,0.0001731859,0.001245663,0.007675171,0.006483521,0.04729468,0.00986545,0.007393226,0.0001009809],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970013,0.00001458012,0.0005759202,0.00008395599,0.000003508256,0.00001156073,0.000002346391,0.00001130495,0.002295513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988103,0.00001351797,0.0007378744,0.00008248812,0.000004743103,0.00001040608,0.000008143017,0.000003789593,0.0003286135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002297741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007686675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09975593168979328,"score_gpt":0.3436611381830093,"score_spread":0.243905206493216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}