{"id":"W2956655285","doi":"10.1111/2041-210x.13264","title":"Optimality in prioritizing conservation projects","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Methods in Ecology and Evolution","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Heuristic; Prioritization; Threatened species; Computer science; Operations research; Algorithm; Management science; Machine learning; Mathematics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005880123,0.0009714966,0.001101861,0.001450574,0.0006989114,0.001793853,0.001060419,0.001304788,0.004521479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02287102,0.0007581707,0.000723459,0.001205054,0.001093361,0.001616208,0.0007977525,0.001023364,0.000417632],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002668901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005126491,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009849498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007498268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962639,0.001854675,0.0002675151,0.0004619404,0.000662556,0.0004894629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802904,0.01589211,0.001017419,0.000934032,0.001570985,0.0002951068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001211089,0.0001121843,0.003313041,0.0001001578,0.00004096636,0.00003899178,0.0000835125,0.9422548,0.0006342466,0.01273898,0.001496932,0.03906509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001006946,0.0001944139,0.001074659,0.00005340519,0.00002896623,0.00004388406,0.0001002005,0.9777502,0.001190198,0.01792017,0.001531272,0.0000118617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.5373678,0.0006695393,0.4279827,0.001195649,0.0001208669,0.0006445384,0.0006989876,0.0008571508,0.03046273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7348686,0.0002297122,0.2612212,0.0002164836,0.00003017298,0.0002547367,0.0004526692,0.0001166236,0.00260978],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009849498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03109741,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02172299524862021,"score_gpt":0.3325253743030508,"score_spread":0.3108023790544306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}