{"id":"W2956905953","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.046","title":"Potential benefits of optimal intra-day electricity hedging for the environment: The perspective of electricity retailers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energy Policy","topic":"Electric Power System Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Electricity; Electricity market; Volatility (finance); Business; Electricity retailing; Context (archaeology); Electricity generation; Efficient energy use; Environmental economics; Industrial organization; Natural resource economics; Economics; Finance; Power (physics); Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003305154,0.0001882245,0.0002645788,0.0001953182,0.00008755716,0.00001574795,0.0003711883,0.0001007902,0.00002387998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009912667,0.0001343343,0.0001486638,0.000630889,0.00005175575,0.0000978746,0.00003461395,0.0001482159,0.000003173219],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002954251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006824225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005385173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008636591,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987513,0.00007558185,0.0003300256,0.0002010286,0.0002497268,0.000392304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990537,0.000280405,0.0001600705,0.0003917466,0.00007649841,0.00003759812],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002150047,0.00002085714,0.00005036349,0.00002012763,0.0001693391,1.044472e-7,0.0005251222,0.924082,0.01212834,0.05996554,0.0001647629,0.002851906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006482778,0.0002106767,0.001447064,0.00002168063,0.000101367,0.000007596832,0.0001590387,0.8438659,0.1517677,0.0005738548,0.0009347806,0.0002620616],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2708738,0.006920724,0.7097467,0.0008576659,0.0004543492,0.001214328,0.00005885549,0.0001949779,0.009678621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998691,0.0004414128,0.0002922841,0.00003872918,0.0001963394,0.00004169146,0.000005976611,0.00004368788,0.0002489429],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7278171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5477994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004252350394112601,"score_gpt":0.1897730186909262,"score_spread":0.1855206682968136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}