{"id":"W2957121315","doi":"10.1007/s00267-019-01183-6","title":"The Insignificance of Thresholds in Environmental Impact Assessment: an Illustrative Case Study in Canada: a Critique for Environmental Management","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Environmental Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Stantec (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Insignificance; Forest management; Nature Conservation; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Forestry; Ecology; Agroforestry; Geography; Psychology; Biology; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02117058,0.0008686147,0.001349295,0.001797954,0.02663941,0.01282737,0.006792229,0.06828056,0.005088825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06441726,0.001220257,0.001437345,0.003319882,0.027347,0.005791193,0.005514886,0.05506064,0.0009489635],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0762347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1912566,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9525555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9774435,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9818318,0.004351254,0.001325245,0.001766755,0.006810159,0.003914741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9326193,0.04305116,0.00156532,0.0007414545,0.01725649,0.004766174],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007270497,0.00004655244,0.003524135,0.0002624684,0.00005030395,0.002885029,0.0184327,0.0008701961,0.0004425669,0.1488984,0.7994887,0.02502634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001239625,0.00004838103,0.005333498,0.001645976,0.0001724769,0.001417818,0.03462654,0.002313947,0.0007086066,0.0709727,0.8823181,0.0003180038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.003029485,0.001526872,0.0006732342,0.9801875,0.001337257,0.00002457515,0.0000432134,0.00002131712,0.01315659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0626558,0.00203434,0.002125126,0.9059328,0.002245312,0.00007078081,0.00003188061,0.0001099978,0.0247939],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0762347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5531241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01311936537858016,"score_gpt":0.2879784710524393,"score_spread":0.2748591056738591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}