{"id":"W2957121315","doi":"10.1007/s00267-019-01183-6","title":"The Insignificance of Thresholds in Environmental Impact Assessment: an Illustrative Case Study in Canada: a Critique for Environmental Management","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Environmental Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Stantec (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Insignificance; Forest management; Nature Conservation; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Forestry; Ecology; Agroforestry; Geography; Psychology; Biology; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001065076,0.001542816,0.00132037,0.0002763228,0.0005025277,0.0001278343,0.001634016,0.0004832499,0.001177602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003615489,0.001375083,0.0004194269,0.0002971386,0.000801914,0.0007745519,0.001606125,0.001839816,0.00009529467],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01849829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000109205,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1476733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2388518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908267,0.0008445736,0.001936046,0.002156513,0.002298712,0.001937422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967202,0.0003565882,0.0008803763,0.001786712,0.000001316111,0.0002547951],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003063681,0.005513634,0.9077749,0.0002553599,0.001098065,0.02057669,0.002336808,0.005736385,0.0005827705,0.00001568181,0.03392349,0.02187985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006134692,0.001895193,0.8905445,0.0001311595,0.0004223055,0.0002017012,0.05722859,0.0009715721,0.00006113704,0.0001778434,0.03997604,0.002255302],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798309,0.000186302,0.0000434931,0.003149006,0.0005281672,0.01163728,0.001496508,0.00002455336,0.003103857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813801,0.0006818681,0.0003924505,0.01050423,0.000174519,0.002026029,0.000979416,0.0002389227,0.003622475],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09117842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997355,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01311936537858016,"score_gpt":0.2879784710524393,"score_spread":0.2748591056738591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}