{"id":"W2957268742","doi":"10.1016/j.jaging.2019.100796","title":"Geriatrics and humanism: Dementia and fallacies of care","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aging Studies","topic":"Health, Nursing, Elderly Care","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Research Council for Economics, Humanities and Social Science","keywords":"Geriatrics; Humanism; Empathy; Context (archaeology); Geriatric care; Dementia; Multidisciplinary approach; Gerontology; Psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Nursing; Social science; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Political science; Law; History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005769752,0.0001050034,0.0004712272,0.0001553163,0.0003757919,0.0000077574,0.00006952634,0.00007097307,0.00001521011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000165814,0.00008151898,0.00004036608,0.00008066284,0.00007807928,0.0001240557,0.0001016634,0.0003927004,0.000002424172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000993401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001252463,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002598037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006815845,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986613,0.0001750196,0.0005894509,0.0001057717,0.0002287998,0.0002396925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980742,0.0004056974,0.0006582533,0.000102423,0.0006910476,0.00006836478],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003494889,0.00001553522,0.7698905,0.004517078,0.0003341173,0.000009840041,0.2158601,0.000003588508,0.0005620825,0.0004507478,0.003996389,0.004325115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002124324,0.001017095,0.4445243,0.002749757,0.0003671827,0.00002667314,0.5346274,0.000002949832,0.0001593454,0.0008598902,0.01333199,0.0002090583],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9080139,0.08877314,0.00001193023,0.001368814,0.0009702116,0.0001811931,0.000004447705,0.000008149877,0.0006681498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919865,0.006328705,0.001012909,0.0002701477,0.0001905015,0.000001418253,2.820281e-7,0.00001254932,0.0001970189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3253661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3324248,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04802564842939729,"score_gpt":0.4301672512633897,"score_spread":0.3821416028339925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}