{"id":"W2957714523","doi":"10.30658/icrcc.2019.2","title":"Deaf mis-interpretation during Hurricane Irma: A case study and evaluation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the International Crisis and Risk Communication Conference","topic":"Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre Casa","funders":"","keywords":"Embarrassment; Interpreter; Language interpretation; Preparedness; American Sign Language; Sign language; Interpretation (philosophy); Confusion; Deaf community; Psychology; Event (particle physics); Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Linguistics; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01609636,0.0009234198,0.0005412654,0.002375966,0.009849879,0.004181515,0.002532752,0.004064974,0.003633578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04759217,0.0006192549,0.0007420855,0.001373088,0.005107326,0.003186331,0.006574385,0.003417805,0.0009454623],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005730914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006962477,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01074053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04138591,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9845412,0.01077461,0.0007229031,0.0004981314,0.002171218,0.001292011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9704859,0.01807911,0.002180866,0.001245528,0.005616898,0.002391747],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002533835,0.003493774,0.02962336,0.0009041023,0.00004072383,0.03856935,0.8424233,0.0004657832,0.001414714,0.00204987,0.006711481,0.07405011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005782376,0.000915825,0.01048548,0.0008088218,0.00006291315,0.01370554,0.9443943,0.0008567657,0.001825826,0.00101802,0.02576513,0.0001036138],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9770514,0.0008751372,0.002343003,0.003443032,0.0001136332,0.001030288,0.000111619,0.00005299425,0.01497886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822875,0.001929198,0.007814568,0.00153025,0.00006062822,0.0005502898,0.0001099022,0.00006087283,0.005656852],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01609636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08512676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04962766563560343,"score_gpt":0.4103526760947088,"score_spread":0.3607250104591054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}