{"id":"W2958082824","doi":"10.1007/s00267-019-01182-7","title":"Response to Critique of “The Insignificance of Thresholds in Environmental Impact Assessment: An Illustrative Case Study in Canada”","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Insignificance; Environmental impact assessment; Impact assessment; Positive economics; Nature Conservation; Environmental ethics; Environmental policy; Political science; Environmental resource management; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Economics; Ecology; Psychology; Social psychology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007348859,0.0003793141,0.0004659222,0.0001200273,0.00007626876,0.00001352983,0.0005963768,0.00006696746,0.001792361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004513679,0.0003297378,0.0001033318,0.0003785996,0.0002255315,0.0004108528,0.0008642745,0.0002919456,0.0000421821],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005594993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006583989,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3448198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3630265,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963716,0.0006449017,0.0007706604,0.0006611175,0.001023163,0.0005285529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986923,0.00007228676,0.0002498997,0.0007864233,7.623226e-7,0.0001983656],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002208019,0.002026849,0.9477422,0.00001099699,0.00004012593,0.0005179102,0.003006035,0.01313904,0.03199476,0.000005566,0.00002613421,0.001269536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001533867,0.00080898,0.9543291,0.00003215495,0.00002029633,0.00002551298,0.04154975,0.0001942961,0.001095022,0.00002526375,0.00006920772,0.0003165101],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957571,0.00000959318,0.000007365497,0.00008326842,0.0001160165,0.002735142,0.0001219036,0.000004887647,0.001164715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990738,0.00001193411,0.0002013135,0.0001924925,0.000005534041,0.0001133385,0.00001023532,0.00003592647,0.000355406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03854372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009140675477968844,"score_gpt":0.2875526170897937,"score_spread":0.2784119416118249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}