{"id":"W2958082824","doi":"10.1007/s00267-019-01182-7","title":"Response to Critique of “The Insignificance of Thresholds in Environmental Impact Assessment: An Illustrative Case Study in Canada”","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Insignificance; Environmental impact assessment; Impact assessment; Positive economics; Nature Conservation; Environmental ethics; Environmental policy; Political science; Environmental resource management; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Economics; Ecology; Psychology; Social psychology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02672979,0.001481019,0.001838953,0.002342325,0.02450504,0.01327213,0.01254937,0.08028512,0.005747196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1130707,0.001692091,0.002326346,0.005223611,0.02613509,0.005437446,0.007137766,0.07381651,0.001636717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06604493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1573898,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8977985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9226042,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9754202,0.004546766,0.001848283,0.003417838,0.01009706,0.004669858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8910111,0.05075122,0.003898342,0.001674159,0.0456049,0.007060156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002741545,0.00001501305,0.0006842434,0.0001720674,0.00003634417,0.0004364157,0.006549171,0.000646807,0.0003008494,0.02042866,0.9651659,0.005537113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004892135,0.00002292587,0.002827991,0.001152785,0.00008920323,0.0004023019,0.01154475,0.0009248254,0.0006476543,0.01217141,0.9698936,0.0002737251],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008751241,0.0008279723,0.0003489056,0.9922403,0.002813844,0.00001394845,0.00006918106,0.00003111577,0.002779576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01396722,0.0007224861,0.0008806132,0.9761981,0.002541489,0.00004848803,0.00003333265,0.00007722273,0.005530952],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1022015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4791917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009140675477968844,"score_gpt":0.2875526170897937,"score_spread":0.2784119416118249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}