{"id":"W2958658081","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1819409116","title":"Evaluating the prevalence and quality of conference codes of conduct","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Diversity (politics); Gender equity; Misconduct; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1587111,0.0004471206,0.0007250358,0.006934339,0.004464059,0.006628181,0.002443427,0.001722816,0.005870896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6142266,0.0004201949,0.0008703537,0.006307191,0.003758521,0.004865907,0.006389807,0.003248204,0.0006844746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006853248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01293467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009657876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01271129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7787788,0.1281895,0.02787334,0.008997955,0.04955854,0.006601897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2216316,0.41828,0.1800898,0.03651963,0.1270569,0.01642216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006295607,0.0002748611,0.8906431,0.00167659,0.0003805681,0.0001938519,0.01507778,0.0009162566,0.0005371884,0.006283979,0.01224284,0.07114327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000139998,0.0007555824,0.883135,0.003296352,0.0004279824,0.0007940031,0.05214839,0.00551384,0.002686793,0.008920196,0.04189804,0.0002837763],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9175896,0.005759365,0.01516262,0.0137764,0.001402746,0.003074133,0.006737835,0.0003085254,0.03618877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872077,0.0007889105,0.006124537,0.0009602336,0.0001834213,0.001720609,0.001289933,0.00007554038,0.001649137],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8412889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8393543,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3651727153908979,"score_gpt":0.4967557621294849,"score_spread":0.131583046738587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}