{"id":"W2959803122","doi":"10.3390/ani9070436","title":"Development of a Scoring System to Assess Feather Damage in Canadian Laying Hen Flocks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animals","topic":"Animal Nutrition and Physiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Mitacs; Egg Farmers of Canada; University of Guelph","keywords":"Flock; Scoring system; Feather; Feather pecking; Benchmarking; Plumage; Reliability (semiconductor); Pecking order; Computer science; Visual inspection; Statistics; Biology; Mathematics; Ecology; Artificial intelligence; Business; Medicine; Surgery; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001633964,0.00006301773,0.0001422155,0.00002184807,0.00004547109,0.00001177386,0.0001226959,0.00004591175,0.0002827637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007189828,0.0000282139,0.00002327769,0.0001792434,0.00000563084,0.00003156584,0.00003270285,0.00004219836,0.0001447104],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006158549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002420895,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03072963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1173643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993839,0.00002912315,0.0001517579,0.0001476094,0.0000645457,0.0002230077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997749,0.00003370427,0.00003008124,0.00002748409,0.00002659958,0.0001071924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001578785,0.0000120361,0.1830507,0.00001937277,0.000003425063,0.000002831315,0.0001862443,0.00000275954,0.8142583,0.001090592,0.00006466006,0.00129335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006859753,0.00008842446,0.9767689,0.0001011116,9.333313e-7,0.000001092479,0.002295899,0.0000170458,0.001693118,0.000008790849,0.01885808,0.00009799656],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940335,0.00001917051,3.581112e-7,0.0001530488,0.00003391961,0.0001595629,0.00000865329,0.00001312904,0.005578623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993345,8.138187e-7,0.0003691634,0.000150741,0.00003186079,0.000009246301,0.0000056803,6.671547e-7,0.00009732976],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8125651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9757248,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04689495970023604,"score_gpt":0.2530033166637901,"score_spread":0.2061083569635541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}