{"id":"W2960040626","doi":"10.1080/14623943.2019.1642189","title":"Think twice: exploring the effect of reflective practices with peer review on reflective writing and writing quality in computer-science education","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reflective Practice","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Rubric; Reflective writing; Peer feedback; Quality (philosophy); Coding (social sciences); Psychology; Context (archaeology); Mathematics education; Reflective practice; Computer science; Pedagogy; Multimedia; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04945967,0.001074107,0.001382025,0.001662617,0.001931987,0.004098209,0.002284897,0.001553533,0.004503969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2472775,0.0009962389,0.002229366,0.001298913,0.001968192,0.004975466,0.003215038,0.002680488,0.0008291431],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001899062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004360429,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009520303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001492711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9358769,0.04542749,0.00416927,0.00370656,0.009482858,0.001336927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5578507,0.3546745,0.03744751,0.02582158,0.016045,0.00816074],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01071466,0.02841694,0.0720209,0.004700946,0.001729965,0.0003967891,0.1238615,0.00264134,0.01871991,0.003346693,0.00361754,0.7298328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01491576,0.1647662,0.5927989,0.00402612,0.006478856,0.001684847,0.06413899,0.03111616,0.05931294,0.02087859,0.03844989,0.00143283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9740475,0.0002630567,0.01871559,0.0006331773,0.0001889459,0.002145851,0.0001031581,0.0002637463,0.003639004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9258769,0.0003003218,0.06237064,0.0003926016,0.0001540946,0.006962779,0.0001159442,0.0001546376,0.003672099],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9505403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2615708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09172742702217948,"score_gpt":0.5062289109267789,"score_spread":0.4145014839045994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}