{"id":"W2960625573","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2018-0284","title":"Multidisciplinary classification of Canadian river reaches to support the sustainable management of freshwater systems","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; River ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Freshwater ecosystem; Sustainable management; Fluvial; Hydrology (agriculture); Classification scheme; Environmental science; Geography; Climate change; Ecosystem; Water resource management; Ecology; Sustainability; Computer science; Geology; Structural basin","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000618205,0.0003044835,0.0002525311,0.005924769,0.001869156,0.001951643,0.000537079,0.0002381763,0.001843016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002372998,0.0001246262,0.0004135857,0.005521093,0.0005983462,0.000516123,0.001360322,0.0002683459,0.0002396314],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009426088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0153772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.884225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9647776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991861,0.00008896017,0.00005810119,0.0001194163,0.000371994,0.0001753741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986313,0.0001105504,0.0001313362,0.0001135712,0.0008897808,0.0001235044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001131936,0.00007497117,0.494628,0.0003627107,0.0002108263,0.0002249589,0.006014516,0.03117152,0.01227489,0.01334168,0.01431913,0.4272637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007158812,0.0000296223,0.9193015,0.0001651301,0.00007426916,0.00009722118,0.007410056,0.03977296,0.002165769,0.004460067,0.02645014,0.00006604879],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8864471,0.001167753,0.04999934,0.0006932741,0.00004031251,0.0006413694,0.01047434,0.000631156,0.04990552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9239482,0.0004339571,0.06650285,0.00005214062,0.000006102531,0.000129995,0.004110544,0.00005556802,0.004760697],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.115775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2329136,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02149709302990077,"score_gpt":0.2159187380851,"score_spread":0.1944216450551992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}