{"id":"W2960879114","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1905.00495","title":"A Modular Framework for Motion Planning using Safe-by-Design Motion Primitives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Robotic Path Planning Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Workspace; Modular design; Motion planning; Motion (physics); Computer science; Modularity (biology); Robot; Set (abstract data type); Automaton; Motion control; Motion capture; Finite-state machine; Distributed computing; Artificial intelligence; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005904755,0.000465823,0.0005024743,0.0003622249,0.0002714322,0.000220674,0.001579056,0.0006662942,0.00000438968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001719727,0.0005830867,0.0002421084,0.0004728032,0.00007565987,0.0006377983,0.0009421865,0.0007539258,0.00003199078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004758119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001992578,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003676246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.687369e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997042,0.000301798,0.0002906296,0.001614024,0.0001753422,0.0005762101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973627,0.0004694543,0.0005272441,0.001261832,0.0002174825,0.0001612706],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002752627,0.00006727702,0.0006484191,0.0001045664,0.00008933341,0.00006257503,0.0004340207,0.9775992,0.0002362803,0.01985374,0.0000785955,0.0007984759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004064876,0.00007769879,0.0007302641,0.0005162096,0.00008375518,0.000006735691,0.00005936243,0.9298285,0.0004164489,0.06729931,0.00002498304,0.0005502244],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02307168,0.0001275604,0.9738355,0.00005280945,0.001379646,0.00104301,0.00003575478,0.0003360781,0.0001179979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5902747,0.00001434002,0.4092982,0.00004452125,0.0001023496,0.000002207444,0.00003705373,0.00003089744,0.0001957235],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.567203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1565249171591528,"score_gpt":0.2387796409666337,"score_spread":0.08225472380748083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}