{"id":"W2961448545","doi":"10.1108/jkm-01-2018-0007","title":"Knowledge sabotage as an extreme form of counterproductive knowledge behavior: conceptualization, typology, and empirical demonstration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Originality; Conceptualization; Public relations; Critical Incident Technique; Business; Value (mathematics); Interpersonal communication; Knowledge management; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Marketing; Political science; Computer science; Creativity; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007862689,0.0004918126,0.0004559481,0.005450179,0.002094173,0.004466461,0.001247456,0.001440096,0.001411373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02535482,0.0003420959,0.0005683632,0.002755102,0.01540111,0.00467949,0.005428043,0.00155272,0.0001423835],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002794908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002820428,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002383542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002454409,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9859548,0.007137962,0.001340757,0.001187212,0.003570629,0.0008087256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9423478,0.03078125,0.01392267,0.00811483,0.00350053,0.001332947],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003579151,0.0007869369,0.4995081,0.001057333,0.0001091009,0.002449975,0.223365,0.00208055,0.005204358,0.1308769,0.0007858101,0.133418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005509128,0.001027411,0.3601604,0.002570299,0.0001425626,0.01169269,0.4518481,0.01862726,0.008370309,0.1165106,0.02869483,0.0003005045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9467089,0.0007354312,0.02838169,0.0006553977,0.00002526559,0.000318149,0.00004897569,0.0000663258,0.02305978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938683,0.0001737844,0.005388073,0.00007001744,0.000008104225,0.0001698284,0.00002509937,0.000009031007,0.0002878536],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007862689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04158235,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05832151686181911,"score_gpt":0.3747423233515909,"score_spread":0.3164208064897718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}