{"id":"W2961483213","doi":"10.1177/1073110519857281","title":"Vexed Again: Social Scientists and the Revision of the Common Rule, 2011-2018","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Health and Human Services","keywords":"Rulemaking; Notice; Process (computing); Political science; Common Rule; Law; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Engineering; Philosophy; Computer science; Medicine; Alternative medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1041266,0.0005964814,0.0009173322,0.00218949,0.02405646,0.02789331,0.003685656,0.04715526,0.003220828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2282983,0.001140628,0.001878579,0.001802174,0.02897218,0.01317252,0.01253399,0.04404781,0.001174305],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04570629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1100125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1490448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1240089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8775162,0.04096034,0.01196822,0.0161981,0.03732819,0.01602892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8683937,0.08310995,0.007494911,0.007357927,0.02626132,0.007382161],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001094044,0.00006170807,0.00194681,0.00009805631,0.00002432291,0.0004338709,0.01182379,0.0003004837,0.0003163453,0.8286928,0.1398883,0.01630409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001134221,0.00009360423,0.004713367,0.0007257697,0.00005832952,0.0002295285,0.004428218,0.0005636224,0.00137056,0.1167594,0.8707286,0.0002155939],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01876899,0.006646138,0.004533645,0.8795598,0.009947933,0.000156188,0.0002585938,0.0001047535,0.08002394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3479719,0.003541018,0.007635787,0.5507284,0.007212624,0.0005317036,0.0003290657,0.0001843071,0.08186533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8958734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5506808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3893583249759698,"score_gpt":0.5582775848073637,"score_spread":0.1689192598313938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}