{"id":"W2961893681","doi":"10.1080/01490400.2019.1578708","title":"The go-along interview: a valuable tool for leisure research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leisure Sciences","topic":"Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management","field":"Psychology","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Dalhousie University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Situated; Ethnography; Participant observation; Data collection; Sample (material); Interview; Protocol (science); Research ethics; Psychology; Sociology; Applied psychology; Qualitative research; Mental health; Power (physics); Medical education; Public relations; Computer science; Medicine; Social science; Alternative medicine; Psychotherapist","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01434909,0.0002162676,0.0003217132,0.0002159697,0.001219828,0.00058995,0.001693888,0.0001303668,0.0008186185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002082444,0.0001394352,0.000159615,0.001115401,0.0007045084,0.0003883094,0.0002413183,0.0003091257,0.002097514],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008090896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001785736,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004049647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003973074,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956044,0.0008758806,0.00047586,0.000892818,0.00111934,0.001031693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968285,0.001595212,0.0001793998,0.0009406761,0.0003770193,0.0000792132],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005337707,0.0001055274,0.7423174,0.00007373811,0.00007863778,0.000002657099,0.001307704,0.0001182351,0.00007928526,0.1516269,0.06308937,0.04114711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007213274,0.0006168368,0.2707697,0.00009713275,0.00002464189,0.00000690263,0.003077248,0.0007723772,0.0001523776,0.01184934,0.7116182,0.0002939488],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8522276,0.002490551,0.001863727,0.008992099,0.004337474,0.004163743,0.00001109217,0.0001569082,0.1257568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8990784,0.00006322583,0.0005436335,0.00003577217,0.0003315089,0.0007323027,0.000006684027,0.00003036392,0.09917815],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6485288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986795,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1383963337645482,"score_gpt":0.4407708782320467,"score_spread":0.3023745444674985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}