{"id":"W2962429249","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.27732v1","title":"Bayesian meta-analysis of studies with rare events: Do the choice of prior distributions and the exclusion of studies without events in both arms matter?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Frequentist inference; Meta-analysis; Bayesian probability; Rare events; Statistics; Random effects model; Odds ratio; Randomized controlled trial; Confidence interval; Medicine; Credible interval; Publication bias; Odds; Econometrics; Internal medicine; Mathematics; Bayesian inference; Logistic regression","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3992432,0.003171989,0.01340334,0.006915195,0.001468741,0.007749763,0.005202698,0.0071318,0.002548577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6723186,0.003102192,0.02311586,0.007172803,0.004218543,0.01262846,0.003226642,0.008972839,0.0004653517],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003437165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004431402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003713798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004044774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5606552,0.3931297,0.01752869,0.01289908,0.01451503,0.001272215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.271392,0.6771137,0.02296697,0.02075687,0.006995889,0.0007746103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01257349,0.0004340861,0.06209872,0.05014347,0.4048678,0.001589185,0.002727127,0.102867,0.002671477,0.07203771,0.008542028,0.2794481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009991765,0.002479358,0.02864555,0.02162263,0.2401285,0.001602836,0.000692418,0.1686708,0.005530209,0.4966755,0.02301796,0.0009424871],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07117915,0.2124762,0.6857579,0.02001843,0.001238828,0.002539156,0.001600507,0.0007332105,0.004456625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7125378,0.03166825,0.2399314,0.009618429,0.0009900548,0.002913842,0.001404705,0.000377078,0.0005585182],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6007568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7408401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6188394358402168,"score_gpt":0.5283538914667333,"score_spread":0.09048554437348355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}