{"id":"W2962505879","doi":"","title":"The Adoption of Cost-Benefit Analysis as an Indicator for Evaluate the Accounting Performance of Business Entities(The Case Study for Canadian Railway)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies journal","topic":"Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Sample (material); Management accounting; Order (exchange); Business; Cost accounting; Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Test (biology); Cost–benefit analysis; Actuarial science; Operations management; Economics; Finance; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004277033,0.0001368367,0.0005440259,0.0003070472,0.001479913,0.00008416874,0.000310003,0.0001006697,0.00001642431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004307602,0.00008706715,0.0001941483,0.0007349959,0.0001551341,0.0003385679,0.00005414024,0.0002572673,0.000001426029],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005654337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007230933,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004245244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003920504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983987,0.00002533165,0.001002842,0.0002034936,0.0001033833,0.0002662271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975808,0.0003545119,0.001500071,0.0001401458,0.0003864902,0.00003797466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008548496,0.00005767151,0.9730994,0.00006934087,0.001397787,6.407169e-7,0.003341472,0.001630845,0.000002601345,0.007980007,0.0001243252,0.0122105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001279507,0.0002828968,0.9602959,0.0000456432,0.001063793,0.00003185691,0.01993251,0.007092628,0.000028666,0.002555076,0.00717007,0.000221446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963144,0.002008436,0.0001070753,0.0008124434,0.0001727155,0.0004527491,0.00007471839,0.000002019643,0.00005544094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986779,0.0008279774,0.00003804609,0.0000827987,0.0002217255,0.00004971453,0.000003327036,0.000009569113,0.00008891323],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01659104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998201,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05275873164169242,"score_gpt":0.2964502113104245,"score_spread":0.2436914796687321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}