{"id":"W2962695992","doi":"10.1016/j.jfa.2013.06.016","title":"An optimal bound on the number of interior spike solutions for the Lin–Ni–Takagi problem","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Functional Analysis","topic":"Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Glaucoma Research Foundation","keywords":"Mathematics; Bounded function; Domain (mathematical analysis); Integer (computer science); Constant (computer programming); Combinatorics; Upper and lower bounds; Unit (ring theory); Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004614471,0.002351082,0.002963711,0.001800968,0.001581831,0.003928615,0.003642695,0.003741249,0.01698198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02537157,0.001333559,0.002129134,0.001436622,0.002651265,0.005315928,0.00580319,0.005504672,0.001347835],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001759325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002311441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006528175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009495866,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982874,0.0006185258,0.00008869988,0.0003002095,0.000407107,0.0002980545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855774,0.01087578,0.0005936432,0.0007459536,0.001004437,0.001202791],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002052221,0.0005709601,0.002183611,0.001432637,0.0003319258,0.0003877529,0.0005007398,0.3547607,0.02169129,0.49049,0.01785844,0.1077397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000947892,0.0001843721,0.0005042592,0.0001204985,0.00006272412,0.0001570958,0.0001524514,0.7815172,0.002698423,0.2118321,0.002631913,0.00004420117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1015178,0.003156336,0.8299654,0.004784324,0.0007971698,0.0002482651,0.0005162642,0.0004026782,0.05861177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5401583,0.003086305,0.4313104,0.001034542,0.0007910037,0.0007652752,0.001117229,0.0007338508,0.02100301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01698198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05681044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03091464620929489,"score_gpt":0.2720880877481083,"score_spread":0.2411734415388134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}