{"id":"W2962695992","doi":"10.1016/j.jfa.2013.06.016","title":"An optimal bound on the number of interior spike solutions for the Lin–Ni–Takagi problem","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Functional Analysis","topic":"Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Glaucoma Research Foundation","keywords":"Mathematics; Bounded function; Domain (mathematical analysis); Integer (computer science); Constant (computer programming); Combinatorics; Upper and lower bounds; Unit (ring theory); Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006448341,0.00009746446,0.0002159842,0.0001211966,0.0001902489,0.0001041257,0.0005668644,0.0000299999,0.0001545341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001598213,0.00004948104,0.0003441021,0.0004792287,0.00005602771,0.000432277,0.00006286656,0.0001874276,0.00001235057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004621299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004387559,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004873941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001453963,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988506,0.00002906059,0.0004618653,0.0001176136,0.0003703813,0.0001704201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980943,0.0006785322,0.0003060361,0.0003130611,0.000547149,0.00006089247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001539458,0.00006949755,0.00007117696,0.000008454383,0.0006436359,3.740322e-7,0.0001181732,0.9478714,0.001042074,0.04813777,0.0004345406,0.001587494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001032173,0.00009811503,0.0008567846,0.00001950077,0.0002699551,0.00002100243,0.0000738476,0.9769486,0.0001439168,0.02123719,0.000163762,0.00006414552],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02649752,0.00003950213,0.9704508,0.002634835,0.0001685945,0.0001016275,0.000002184971,0.00001148874,0.00009341358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8147039,0.000006609673,0.1848233,0.0001503882,0.000164135,0.00002610922,6.677354e-7,0.000006717593,0.0001181542],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7882064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2017778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03091464620929489,"score_gpt":0.2720880877481083,"score_spread":0.2411734415388134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}