{"id":"W2962716591","doi":"","title":"Spatial Point-pattern Analysis of a Population of Lodgepole Pine","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest and Environmental Science","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pinus contorta; Foothills; Competition (biology); Ecology; Spatial distribution; Common spatial pattern; Geography; Forestry; Biology; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005420027,0.00007557256,0.0002036621,0.0001878702,0.00009643821,0.000007562674,0.0002325229,0.00002917566,0.001013399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002185268,0.000059661,0.00007697023,0.0003928761,0.00151154,0.0003421391,0.0002092029,0.00005196383,0.000008783724],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008442911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004978028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008113323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001250397,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989061,0.00001809687,0.000364988,0.0001415622,0.0004137116,0.0001555687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993396,0.00001617536,0.0004224872,0.0001294546,0.000005685164,0.0000865776],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003180152,0.0001139062,0.982834,0.000003441177,0.00004929646,0.000002567557,0.0002657796,0.001678516,0.009295343,0.0001199557,0.00005009029,0.005555289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002174544,0.0004688614,0.9906223,0.000007097802,0.0001553804,0.00000797201,0.00008524922,0.005619772,0.002080906,0.0005913362,0.00008509263,0.00005853067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951312,0.0000158958,0.004074684,0.00007388095,0.0001025073,0.0000560035,0.000004693028,0.000001330035,0.0005398322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995217,0.00002600704,0.0003307925,0.00004965941,0.00002507645,4.798807e-7,0.000002557068,0.000002734497,0.00004103001],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007788334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004426567645731807,"score_gpt":0.2083288577253606,"score_spread":0.2039022900796288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}