{"id":"W2963202200","doi":"10.1007/s11069-019-03669-2","title":"Getting Canadians prepared for natural disasters: a multi-method analysis of risk perception, behaviors, and the social environment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Hazards","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Employment and Social Development Canada; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Natural hazard; Natural disaster; Preparedness; Emergency management; Government (linguistics); Disaster risk reduction; Disaster research; Empirical research; Poison control; Risk perception; Population; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Public relations; Geography; Perception; Political science; Environmental health; Environmental planning; Medicine; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01394598,0.001104076,0.001000912,0.003084679,0.01135596,0.00343089,0.002231188,0.001103676,0.002817611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02725275,0.0006742505,0.002713164,0.005838962,0.001912578,0.001300256,0.003010239,0.001701388,0.0001314658],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04131323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07687559,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9714848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9814996,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9905609,0.004922654,0.000480404,0.0007627044,0.002110457,0.001162878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867357,0.00562233,0.001398631,0.0007859716,0.00462172,0.0008357342],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008961465,0.001321827,0.890966,0.0003122903,0.001145603,0.0001599146,0.06083342,0.001882587,0.0005035357,0.0022484,0.00228162,0.03744866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001668551,0.0006832894,0.8807551,0.0001824398,0.0005794289,0.00006643166,0.1030339,0.008641361,0.0004135654,0.0009017442,0.004397692,0.0001781379],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937225,0.0002142949,0.002238687,0.0003171032,0.000032734,0.0009528846,0.000668159,0.00001283433,0.001840865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859955,0.0002590997,0.009304259,0.0001781731,0.00001540329,0.00166425,0.0008395158,0.00001763081,0.001726194],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04131323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2997499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007876888642581436,"score_gpt":0.3117104591194542,"score_spread":0.3038335704768727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}