{"id":"W2963306680","doi":"10.4230/lipics.icalp.2016.75","title":"Tight Analysis of a Multiple-Swap Heurstic for Budgeted Red-Blue Median","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics)","topic":"Facility Location and Emergency Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Swap (finance); Upper and lower bounds; Mathematics; Heuristic; Combinatorics; Matching (statistics); Approximation algorithm; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Statistics; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003855446,0.002683109,0.003294802,0.001847182,0.002135932,0.004274984,0.004323069,0.003060977,0.02844721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02076838,0.001554411,0.002558457,0.002879664,0.00227872,0.007915159,0.004901108,0.005886111,0.002631221],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004769203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003244501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005435696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007596036,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965504,0.0009762548,0.0001138142,0.0005747905,0.0007987977,0.000985871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911634,0.005676723,0.0006321175,0.001057267,0.0006400181,0.0008304632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001286846,0.0006038719,0.002685177,0.0007418251,0.0002281822,0.0003403935,0.0005797936,0.7389202,0.004872626,0.1671595,0.02962033,0.0529613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000872893,0.0001707486,0.0004484873,0.0001214357,0.00006635347,0.0001365909,0.0001773096,0.8811853,0.00123295,0.1113463,0.005000342,0.00002701957],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1287569,0.00311643,0.7881988,0.005303823,0.0003260445,0.0005415151,0.001742948,0.001665652,0.07034793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6084941,0.001785712,0.358265,0.001951437,0.0003332048,0.000825635,0.002046359,0.001418667,0.02487987],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02844721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09516537,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02371906159291856,"score_gpt":0.2428290215920341,"score_spread":0.2191099599991156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}