{"id":"W2963412611","doi":"10.1039/c9ra90057h","title":"Correction: Effect of nanoclay orientation on oxygen barrier properties of LbL nanocomposite coated films","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"RSC Advances","topic":"Conducting polymers and applications","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; ProAmpac (Canada); Polytechnique Montréal; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Nanocomposite; Materials science; Orientation (vector space); Oxygen; Chemical engineering; Composite material; Chemistry; Organic chemistry; Mathematics; Geometry; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002039333,0.0002625379,0.0005492779,0.0001115173,0.0001235665,0.00002742196,0.000282195,0.0001786621,0.0003289438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009619797,0.0001953222,0.0001161773,0.0002374293,0.0001766704,0.0001802086,0.00005455812,0.0001989626,0.00008670539],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003569505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000129778,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001212838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001608136,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984493,0.0001202109,0.000440364,0.0004287644,0.0003640714,0.0001972729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985657,0.000136912,0.0006722012,0.000425816,0.0001561839,0.00004317078],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001342641,0.00003375642,0.00005116345,0.00046938,0.00001689187,3.257528e-7,0.0002426146,0.0001140501,0.9433635,0.00001542643,0.05421081,0.001347743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002344855,0.0004330435,0.00002932398,0.0007566929,0.00005687862,0.000002809283,0.00009106224,0.00006245598,0.9114754,0.000005278187,0.08666195,0.0001906048],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.905737,0.008696094,0.00009541662,0.00007389487,0.06805726,0.001626333,0.0003161079,0.0001479741,0.01524995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7527635,0.0004861759,0.0002716703,0.00005067901,0.0005923194,0.0002549359,0.0003222466,0.00007533262,0.2451832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2299332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.796501,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01170293518494224,"score_gpt":0.2624767299852581,"score_spread":0.2507737948003159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}