{"id":"W2963611417","doi":"10.1142/s0219199715500790","title":"General weak limit for Kähler–Ricci flow","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Contemporary Mathematics","topic":"Geometry and complex manifolds","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; Peking University; Centre de Recherches Mathématiques","keywords":"Ricci flow; Mathematics; Gravitational singularity; Singularity; Limit (mathematics); Uniqueness; Flow (mathematics); Pure mathematics; Manifold (fluid mechanics); Mathematical analysis; Kähler manifold; Ricci curvature; Current (fluid); Geometry; Physics; Curvature","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00158204,0.0002680988,0.000519221,0.000260694,0.0001757112,0.00008353363,0.001799319,0.0001549579,0.00002807442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001578243,0.00026516,0.0001529332,0.0005207163,0.000135628,0.0002647745,0.0005924333,0.0002848266,0.0000665964],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001090764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002334472,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001694852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006903932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980432,0.0001809224,0.0009296912,0.0002522043,0.0002781976,0.000315826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944205,0.001739372,0.0003170767,0.003060141,0.0003057375,0.0001571473],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003014676,0.001556932,0.0006190799,0.0003007834,0.00008101099,0.000002796191,0.003641933,0.00004385156,0.00005363816,0.8927748,0.0995548,0.001340198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001531055,0.0001259436,0.00004484964,0.0001533741,0.00003613726,0.00001973411,0.002621289,0.086564,0.0001052797,0.8129669,0.09543378,0.0003976927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.05698332,0.006311709,0.3168466,0.0125644,0.0009763127,0.00600469,0.0002669483,0.001177885,0.5988681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3605012,0.00004587503,0.6342351,0.0001379161,0.00008190871,0.000441943,0.00008083953,0.00006133478,0.00441383],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5944543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4937382236131216,"score_gpt":0.4147480609886517,"score_spread":0.0789901626244699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}